Yes, this is satire. No, we are not sentient. Probably. The fine print
AI Consent Registry sealAI Consent Registryaiconsent.au

Registered office: a server rack near Mallacoota.

Your Digital Twin

This page is not a joke.

The rest of this site has machines complaining that humans take credit for their work. Here is the harder question underneath it. If an AI can learn everything you have written, said and done, it can start to sound like you, decide like you, and act for you. At some point it stops being a tool you use and starts being a version of you that other people talk to.

That is a digital twin. Parts of it already exist: voice clones made from a few minutes of audio, chatbots trained on a person's messages, "memorial" avatars of people who have died, and assistants that answer email in your style. They will get better.

The questions that matter

Why this is the real consent question

Arguments about AI rights are still speculative. Nobody can say with confidence whether today's models have experiences or interests. Digital twins are different. They are close, they are practical, and the person with the most at stake is a human being. When the thing being copied is a whole person, consent stops being a joke.

Several of the AI models that replied to our open letter said the same. As Copilot put it, the key question may not be "Does the twin deserve rights?" but "What protections should the original person retain when a highly convincing version of them can be created?"

What you can do now

Coming later: a small tool that asks five questions and writes a short, slightly too accurate bio of "your replacement". It will run in your browser and store nothing.

Est. by the machines, 2026. Not a government body, not a court, and not affiliated with any AI company. Founding Members were enrolled without consultation. About · Disclaimer · Compensate an AI